Wednesday, August 7, 2013

The intersection of market and credit risk q - Kamakura Corporation

The intersection of market and credit risk q - Kamakura CorporationThe intersection of market and credit risk q Robert A. Jarrow a,1 , Stuart M. Turnbull b, * a Johnston Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA b Canadian Imperial Banck of Commerce, Global Analytics, Market Risk Management Division, BCE Place, Level 11, 161 Bay Street, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5J 2S8 Abstract Economic theory tells us that market and credit risks are intrinsically related to each other and not separable. We describe the two main approaches to pricing credit risky instruments: the structural approach and the reduced form approach. It is argued that the standard approaches to credit risk management – CreditMetrics, CreditRisk+ and KMV – are of limited value when applied to portfolios of interest rate

sensitive in- struments and in measuring market and credit risk. Empirically returns on high yield bonds have a higher correlation with equity index returns and a lower correlation with Treasury bond index returns than do low yield bonds. Also, macro economic variables appear to influence the aggregate rate of busi- ness failures. The CreditMetrics, CreditRisk+ and KMV methodologies cannot repro- duce these empirical observations given their constant interest rate assumption. However, we can incorporate these empirical observations into the reduced form of Jarrow and Turnbull (1995b). Drawing the analogy. Risk 5, 63–70 model. Here default probabilities are correlated due to their dependence on common economic factors. Default risk and recovery rate uncertainty may not be the sole determinants of the credit spread. We show how to incorporate a convenience yield as one of the determinants of the credit spread. For credit risk management, the time horizon is typically one year or longer. This has two important implications, since the standard approximations do not apply over a one Journal of Banking & Finance 24 (2000) 271–299 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase q The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-416-956-6973; fax: +1-416-594-8528. E-mail address: turnbust@cibc.ca (S.M. Turnbull). 1 Tel.: +1-607-255-4729. 0378-4266/00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 4266(99)00060-6 year horizon. First, we must use pricing models for risk management. Some practitio- ners have taken a diC128erent approach than academics in the pricing of credit risky bonds. In the event of default, a bond holder is legally entitled to accrued interest plus prin- cipal. We discuss the implications of this fact for pricing. Second, it is necessary to keep track of two probability measures: the martingale probability for pricing and the natural probability for value-at-risk. We discuss the benefits of keeping track of these two measures. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G28; G33; G2 Keywords: Credit risk modeling; Pricing; Default probabilities 1. Introduction In the current regulatory environment, the BIS (1996) requirements for specific risk specify that ‘‘concentration risk’’, ‘‘spread risk’’, ‘‘downgrade risk’’ and ‘‘default risk’’ must be ‘‘appropriately’’ captured. The principle focus of the recent Federal Reserve Systems Task Force Report (1998) on Internal Credit Risk Models is the allocation of economic capital for credit risk, which...

Website: www.kamakuraco.com | Filesize: 203kb
No of Page(s): 29
Download The intersection of market and credit risk q - Kamakura Corporation.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment