Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

A monthly research report from the EBRI Education and Research Fund © 2012 Employee Benefit Research Institute November 2012 • No. 378 Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation: Geographic Differences and Trends, 2011 By Craig Copeland, Ph.D., Employee Benefit Research Institute AT A GLANCE In 2011, the percentage of workers participating in an employment-based retirement plan was essentially unchanged from a year earlier. Specifically, the percentage of all workers (including part-time and self- employed) participating in an employment-based retirement plan moved from 39.6 percent in 2009, to 39.8 percent in 2010, to 39.7 in 2011. The increase in the number of workers participating in 2011 halted the three year decline from 2008–2010. Some of the categories examined had increases in

the probability of workers participating and others showed decreases. Many of the categories of workers remained near their 2009 levels of participation. The type of employment has a major impact on participation rates. Among full-time, full-year wage and salary workers ages 21–64 (those with the strongest connection to the work force), 53.7 percent participated. This rate varies significantly across various worker characteristics and the characteristics of their employers. Being nonwhite, younger, female, never married; having lower educational attainment, lower earnings, poorer health status, no health insurance through own employer; not working full time, full year, and working in service occupations or farming, fisheries, and forestry occupations were all associated with a lower level of participation in a retirement plan. Workers in the South and West were less likely to participate in a plan than those in other regions of the country. The overall percentage of females participating in a plan was lower than that of males (the retirement plan participation gender gap significantly closed from 1987‒2009 before slightly widening in 2010 and 2011). But when controlling for work status or earnings, the female participation level actually surpasses that of males. Nonnative-born Hispanics had substantially lower participation levels than native-born Hispanics, even when controlling for age and earnings. This results in Hispanics as a group looking to lag significantly in terms of retirement plan participation, when only the nonnative Hispanics actually have participation levels substantially below those of all other workers. The downturns in the economy and stock market in 2008 and into 2009 showed a two-year decline in both the number and percentage of workers participating in an employment-based retirement plan. The 2010 and 2011 participation levels stabilized as the economy recovered. ebri.org Issue Brief • November 2012 • No. 378 2 Craig Copeland is senior research associate at the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI). This Issue Brief was written with assistance from the Institute’s research and editorial staffs. Any views expressed in this report are those of the author and should not be ascribed to the officers, trustees, or other sponsors of EBRI, the Employee Benefit Research Institute–Education and Research Fund (EBRI-ERF), or their staffs. Neither EBRI nor EBRI-ERF lobbies or takes positions on specific policy proposals. EBRI invites comment on this research. Copyright Information: This report is copyrighted by the EBRI. It may be used without permission but citation of the source...

Website: www.ebri.org | Filesize: 2632kb
No of Page(s): 44
Download Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation - Employee ....pdf